Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
r NHE PART PLAYED by Mahatma Gandhi in the peaceful achievement of India's freedom and in challenging the tradin i tional place of'untouchables' in Hindu society is generally recognized. His economic ideas, however, are less widely respected, even in India. Inspired mainly by Gandhian teaching, a few Westerners, of whom Aldous Huxley is the best known, have put the case for a decentralized economy. But they have made few converts. Gandhi himself did not want his thought to be treated as a sacrosanct system. 'IfI were to know, after my death', he wrote in I940, 'that what I stood for had degenerated into sectarianism, I should be deeply pained.... You are no followers but fellow students, fellow pilgnms, fellow seekers and fellow workers.' 2 The waniing is important because when his social philosophy is discussed as a system, it is usually offiered as an alternative to Western philosophies. In consequence, those aspects which are least Western perhaps receive undue emphasis.3 As a final synthesis Gandhi's thought is unacceptable. Seen, however, in the context of India's problems-which in varying degree are those of all South-East Asia -there is far more to be saidfor it than is generally realized. It can fill a valuable role in the second half of this century by inspiring other syntheses on equally imaginative lines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kenneth Rivett (1959) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: