Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Upstream public engagement with new science and technology is considered important but challenging. This article shows how engagement events are embedded in broader institutional and cultural contexts. By studying two different cases of upstream engagement in nanotechnology, we demonstrate how existing institutional responsibilities and cultural repertoires contribute much to the productivity of actual engagement events. Insight into these wider world dynamics will help science communicators (or event organizers) foster reflection and deliberation among relevant actors about whether and how upstream public engagement can have an impact on the governance of new science and technology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krabbenborg et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: