Life-long sequential changes in glucose tolerance and insulin secretion were investigated in genetically obese Zucker rats (fa/fa) fed a diabetogenic diet rich in lard and sucrose. Comparisons were made with lean littermates (Fa/-) receiving normal chow diet. At 3-month intervals, seven to nine lean and obese rats had two permanent venous catheters implanted, allowing stress- and pain-free sampling of blood before, during, and after substrate administration. Intravenous glucose, iv arginine, and oral glucose tolerance were tested. The obese rats progressively developed hyperglycemia and severe hyperinsulinemia; their basal glycemia reached 8.8 +/- 1.1 vs. 5.8 +/- 0.2 mmol/liter in the lean rats at 46 weeks of age; respective insulinemia was 287.7 +/- 61.9 and 18.1 +/- 2.8 mU/liter (mean +/- SD). In the obese rats a distinct loss in glucose tolerance was seen with progression of age in spite of rising stimulated insulin secretion, which suggests progressive development of insulin resistance without exhaustion of B-cell secretory capacity. Absence of insulin deficiency was also suggested by immunohistochemical staining of pancreatic tissue specimens from obese rats, which showed large populations of insulin-containing cells. Like the obese animals, lean rats exhibited a decrease in insulin sensitivity with age. Relating basal individual glycemia and insulinemia, a rise by 1 mmol/liter in glycemia was associated with a 8.8-fold rise in basal insulinemia in lean rats, but only with a 1.8-fold increase in obese rats. Similar correlations for stimulated glycemia and insulinemia suggest impaired glucose sensitivity of pancreatic B-cells in obese vs. lean rats. In conclusion, hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia in insulin-resistant obese Zucker rats on a diabetogenic diet are not characterized by quantitatively deficient B-cell secretory capacity, but, rather, by impaired B-cell sensitivity to glucose with qualitatively intact regulation of glycemia and insulinemia at elevated plasma concentrations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fürnsinn et al. (1991) studied this question.