Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article reports an update of a meta-analysis of the effects of whole language originally conducted by Stahl and Miller (1989). Using studies conducted since 1988, the present meta-analysis suggests that whole-language approaches still produce effects on achievement essentially similar to that of basal readers. However, relatively few studies were found that used achievement measures. Looking at these studies as a whole, there seems to be a shifting of goals from achievement to attitude toward reading. Whole-language approaches seem to be effective in improving children's attitudes toward reading. The effects of eclectic programs, which include the use of open-ended tasks and self-selection of literature as in whole-language approaches but also stress an achievement orientation and phonics instruction as in more traditional approaches, seem to be effective in improving both achievement and attitude.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stahl et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: