This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
• Transitions need intermediation to enable place-sensitive governance. • This paper explores the case of a place-based, farmer-led transition intermediary. • Six place-based functions for transition intermediaries are identified. • Place-based transition intermediaries can support transition governance. • The potential of place-based intermediaries deserves policy attention. While literature on transition intermediation is burgeoning, the implications of a sensitivity to “place” in transition intermediation remain ill understood. In this paper, we empirically explore the dynamics of “place-based transition intermediation”, through a case study of the ‘Dune farmers’ in the Netherlands. The farmers initiated a collaboration that serves as a bottom-up, non-state intermediary organization. The case shows the opportunities and intricacies of transition governance through place-based intermediation. We articulate six functions of intermediaries used in such place-sensitive transition governance: (1) Empowerment through cultivating local identity; (2) Constructing place-based relational capital; (3) Developing regional innovative capacity in a place-based innovation system; (4) Stimulating place-based learning; (5) Concretizing transition governance; and (6) Representing place-based networks. We conclude that place-based intermediation deserves attention, both in research and policy, to improve transition governance and help accelerate place-sensitive transition processes towards sustainable futures.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loeber et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: