Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this study, we examine how different features of the built environment—density, diversity of land uses, and design—have consequences for personal networks. We also consider whether different features of the built environment have consequences for the spatial location of persons to whom one is tied by considering their distribution in local area, broader city region, and a more macro spatial scale. We test these ideas with a large sample of the Western United States for three different types of ties. Our findings suggest that the built environment is crucial for personal network structure, both in the number of social ties and where they are located.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boessen et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: