Introduction: Physical activity (PA) during pediatric oncologic treatment provides health benefits to patients. However, different factors can facilitate or hinder this practice. Objective: Verify the association between environmental and sociodemographic factors and leisure time and commuting-related physical activity (LTPA-CPA) of pediatric oncologic patients and their parents. Methods:Cross-sectional study in partnership between the University and the Reference Children’s Oncologic Center. Young patients (10-19 years old) diagnosed with cancer and at any stage of treatment participated, as well as their father or mother. Participants answered socioeconomic and sociodemographic questions, a questionnaire of PA for adolescents, and the environmental scale for youth, through telephone or face-to-face contact. Descriptive statistics, Student’s t-test, Pearson’s chi-square test, Poisson regression, Fisher’s exact test, and the Kappa index were used. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Fisher’s exact test and Kappa Index (k) were performed to verify possible associations and concordance between adolescents and parents, with a p value <0.05. Results: 40 patients partic-ipated in this study (62.5% male), most diagnosed with leukemia (40%) and 40 parents (43.08 ± 7.67 years old; 73% female), 63% white ethnicity and 50% socioeconomic level C1/C2/ D-E. The mean LTPA-CPA by patients was 286.7 ± 238.6 min/week, and by parents it was 50.8 ± 99.7 min/week. There was no association between sociodemographic factors, PA of parents, and LTPA-CPA of patients (p > 0.05). There was a negative association between LTPA-CPA and recreational facilities (p = 0.04), and a positive association for greater neighborhood safety (p = 0.02). Conclusion: There was no association between sociodemographic factors and LTPA-CPA in pediatric patients and their parents. Greater neighborhood safety was associated with this practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guimarães et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: