Key result
A pressure-only Fourier-based machine learning approach accurately estimated aortic wave intensity parameters, demonstrating strong correlation for the first forward wave peak amplitude (r=0.88).
Why the study?
Wave intensity analysis has clinical significance for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, but requires concurrent pressure and flow waveform measurements, limiting its translation into clinical practice.
Does a pressure-only Fourier-based machine learning approach accurately estimate aortic wave intensity compared to standard methods in individuals from the Framingham Heart Study?
Observational (n=2,640)
Does a pressure-only Fourier-based machine learning approach accurately estimate aortic wave intensity compared to standard methods in individuals from the Framingham Heart Study?
Effect estimate: r = 0.88
p-value: p=0.05
A novel pressure-only machine learning approach accurately estimates aortic wave intensity, potentially enabling non-invasive assessment in wearable telemedicine.
OBJECTIVE: The clinical significance of the wave intensity (WI) analysis for the diagnosis and prognosis of the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases is well-established. However, this method has not been fully translated into clinical practice. From practical point of view, the main limitation of WI method is the need for concurrent measurements of both pressure and flow waveforms. To overcome this limitation, we developed a Fourier-based machine learning (F-ML) approach to evaluate WI using only the pressure waveform measurement. METHODS: Tonometry recordings of the carotid pressure and ultrasound measurements for the aortic flow waveforms from the Framingham Heart Study (2640 individuals; 55% women) were used for developing the F-ML model and the blind testing. RESULTS: Method-derived estimates are significantly correlated for the first and second forward wave peak amplitudes (Wf1, r = 0.88, p 0.05; Wf2, r = 0.84, p 0.05) and the corresponding peak times (Wf1, r = 0.80, p < 0.05; Wf2, r = 0.97, p 0.05). For backward components of WI (Wb1), F-ML estimates correlated strongly for the amplitude (r = 0.71, p 0.05) and moderately for the peak time (r = 0.60, p 0.05). The results show that the pressure-only F-ML model significantly outperforms the analytical pressure-only approach based on the reservoir model. In all cases, the Bland-Altman analysis shows negligible bias in the estimations. CONCLUSION: The proposed pressure-only F-ML approach provides accurate estimates for WI parameters. SIGNIFICANCE: The pressure only F-ML approach introduced in this work expand the clinical usage of WI into inexpensive and non-invasive settings such as wearable telemedicine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aghilinejad et al. (2023) reported an observational. Fourier-based machine learning (F-ML) approach vs. Analytical pressure-only approach based on the reservoir model was evaluated on First forward wave peak amplitude (Wf1) (r = 0.88, p=0.05). A pressure-only Fourier-based machine learning approach accurately estimated aortic wave intensity parameters, demonstrating strong correlation for the first forward wave peak amplitude (r=0.88).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: