Key result
Review of ~500 genetic errors of immunity elucidates essential immune functions and genotype-phenotype relationships.
Why the study?
To review genetic errors of immunity within a framework highlighting real-world immunobiology insights from approximately 500 disorders and refining the understanding of immune system function.
This review provides a framework for understanding essential immune functions through the lens of approximately 500 inborn errors of immunity.
Throughout biology, the pursuit of genotype-phenotype relationships has provided foundational knowledge upon which new concepts and hypotheses are built. Genetic perturbation, whether occurring naturally or in experimental settings, is the mainstay of mechanistic dissection in biological systems. The unbiased discovery of causal genetic lesions via forward genetics in patients who have a rare disease elucidates a particularly impactful set of genotype-phenotype relationships. Here, we review the field of genetic errors of immunity, often termed inborn errors of immunity (IEIs), in a framework aimed at highlighting the powerful real-world immunology insights provided collectively and individually by these (approximately) 500 disorders. By conceptualizing essential immune functions in a model of the adaptive arsenal of rapid defenses, we organize IEIs based on immune circuits in which sensors, relays, and executioners cooperate to carry out pathogen clearance functions in an effective yet regulated manner. We review and discuss findings from IEIs that not only reinforce known immunology concepts but also offer surprising phenotypes, prompting an opportunity to refine our understanding of immune system function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bender et al. (2025) conducted a review in Genetic errors of immunity (inborn errors of immunity). A review of approximately 500 genetic errors of immunity highlights how these disorders elucidate essential immune functions and genotype-phenotype relationships.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: