Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We used a spherical phantom to evaluate geometric accuracy in multi-platform stereotactic neuroimaging for radiosurgery. The phantom consisted of two plastic 16-cm-diameter hemispheres in which an exchangeable 8-cm plastic functional cube was incorporated. The functional cube contained cylinder and point targets. The targets were filled with a mixed aqueous solution of 2-mM copper sulfate and 300-mg/ml iodinated contrast medium and were visible on both MR and X-ray images. Two MR scanners and a biplane X-ray angio-suite were used to scan the phantom stereotactically in two sessions of the experiment. The angio-suite was equipped with digital subtraction and distortion-correction software. The resulting stereotactic images were transferred to a dose-planning computer for length measurement and coordinate determination of the targets. The mean errors of the measured cylinder length on distortion non-corrected X-ray stereotactic images were 0.24 +/- 0.14 and 0.73 +/- 0.10 mm, respectively, in the experiments; on distortion-corrected images 0.22 +/- 0.10 and 0.35 +/- 0.39 mm. They were 0.50 +/- 0.24, 0.25 +/- 0.19 and 0.49 +/- 0.34, 0.23 +/- 0.25 mm, respectively, of the two MR scanners. The mean errors of coordinate determination of point targets between the stereotactic MR and the distortion-corrected X-ray images were 0.70 +/- 0.18, 0.52 +/- 0.22 and 0.76 +/- 0.25, 0.40 +/- 0.10 mm, respectively, in the experiments. We found that the overall geometric errors of target delineation between stereotactic MR and X-ray images were in the submillimeter range. The current study validates the multi-platform and multi-facility stereotactic neuroimaging practice and ensures imaging accuracy in radiosurgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: