What are the rates and predictors of nontreatment with antithrombotic and antihypertensive therapies 3 months after ischemic stroke, and does treatment status affect 3-year recurrence-free survival?
A significant proportion of ischemic stroke patients do not receive appropriate secondary prevention therapies at 3 months, driven by stroke severity and subtype.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We sought to examine the frequency, predictors, and effects of nontreatment with antithrombotic and antihypertensive therapies 3 months after ischemic stroke. METHODS: The population-based South London Community Stroke Register prospectively collected data on first-in-a-lifetime strokes between 1995 and 1997. Among patients registered with ischemic stroke, treatment status with antithrombotic and antihypertensive therapies was examined 3 months after the event. RESULTS: In a cohort of 457 patients with ischemic stroke, 393 (86.0%) were considered appropriate for antiplatelet medication, 32 (7.0%) for anticoagulant medication, and 254 (55.9%) for antihypertensive medication. The rates of nontreatment observed 3 months after the event were 24.4% for antiplatelet, 59.4% for anticoagulant, and 29.5% for antihypertensive medication. Independent risk factors for nontreatment with antithrombotic therapies (antiplatelets and anticoagulants) were the subtype of stroke (nonlacunar infarct: OR=1. 60, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.54), stroke severity measured by the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score (GCS </=13: OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.18 to 3.66) and the Barthel Index (BI) score 5 days after the event (BI </=10: OR 1. 85, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.93). For antihypertensive therapies the stroke subtype (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.33 to 4.54), GCS score (OR 2.97, 95% CI 1. 35 to 6.53), BI score (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.27 to 4.29), and ethnicity (Caucasian: OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.15 to 5.14) were independently associated with nontreatment. Cox regression modeling showed no significant association between the treatment status and recurrence-free 3-year survival rates after controlling for severity and subtype of stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Secondary prevention for a common disease such as stroke appears to be inadequate in the study area. Healthcare professionals need to consider antithrombotic and antihypertensive therapies for all stroke patients.
Hillen et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: