Key result
Left atrial appendage closure using the 4th generation WATCHMAN device was feasible and safe, with successful implantation in 94% of patients and no serious hospital complications.
Why the study?
Does left atrial appendage closure with the 4th generation WATCHMAN device improve safety and feasibility in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=36)
Does left atrial appendage closure with the 4th generation WATCHMAN device improve safety and feasibility in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
The 4th generation WATCHMAN device for left atrial appendage closure demonstrates high implantation success (94%) and acceptable safety in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
Supports 4th-generation WATCHMAN feasibility in non-valvular AF; leaves open comparative safety and efficacy versus prior devices or anticoagulation.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of the fourth generation WATCHMAN device. BACKGROUND: The WATCHMAN left atrial appendage (LAA) closure device has been shown to be non-inferior to conventional oral anticoagulation with warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. A new (fourth) generation of the WATCHMAN device was designed to facilitate easier delivery and improve safety. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, non-randomized study of LAA closure with use of the 4(th) generation WATCHMAN device in 36 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Follow-up was performed at 45 days, 6 months and 12 months following implantation. RESULTS: The mean age of the population was 73 ± 6 years and 67% were male. The mean CHADS2 and CHA2 DS2-VASc Score were 2.5 and 4.5, respectively. The device was implanted successfully in 34/36 (94%). No serious hospital complications related to the device or procedure occurred. During 12 month follow-up, three ischemic strokes (8%), one hemorrhagic stroke (3%), one TIA (3%) and three deaths (9%) occurred. Device-associated thrombus formation was detected in one patient (3%) during six-month follow-up and was treated successfully with low molecular weight heparin. CONCLUSIONS: LAA closure with the 4(th) generation WATCHMAN device is feasible and safe. New technical features may contribute to a better performance of the occluder, particularly regarding the risk of pericardial effusions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ledwoch et al. (2015) conducted an observational in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (n=36). 4th generation WATCHMAN device was evaluated on feasibility and safety (successful implantation and serious hospital complications). Left atrial appendage closure using the 4th generation WATCHMAN device was feasible and safe, with successful implantation in 94% of patients and no serious hospital complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: