Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This debate piece argues that implementing prehospital thrombolysis in urban environments is a rational strategy to save lives and reduce long-term morbidity.
This is the first part in a debate on the benefits and disadvantages of urban prehospital thrombolysis. I put the case for prehospital thrombolysis in the urban environment and argue that it is a rational development that will save lives and reduce long term morbidity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jonathan Benger (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: