Why the study?
Does a constrained independent component analysis algorithm improve the accuracy of nonobtrusive pulse rate measurements using a webcam compared to existing algorithms?
Does a constrained independent component analysis algorithm improve the accuracy of nonobtrusive pulse rate measurements using a webcam compared to existing algorithms?
A novel constrained independent component analysis algorithm significantly improves the accuracy of webcam-based nonobtrusive pulse rate measurements, achieving performance comparable to a finger probe oximeter.
May enable remote monitoring; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Nonobtrusive pulse rate measurement using a webcam is considered. We demonstrate how state-of-the-art algorithms based on independent component analysis suffer from a sorting problem which hinders their performance, and propose a novel algorithm based on constrained independent component analysis to improve performance. We present how the proposed algorithm extracts a photoplethysmography signal and resolves the sorting problem. In addition, we perform a comparative study between the proposed algorithm and state-of-the-art algorithms over 45 video streams using a finger probe oxymeter for reference measurements. The proposed algorithm provides improved accuracy: the root mean square error is decreased from 20.6 and 9.5 beats per minute (bpm) for existing algorithms to 3.5 bpm for the proposed algorithm. An error of 3.5 bpm is within the inaccuracy expected from the reference measurements. This implies that the proposed algorithm provided performance of equal accuracy to the finger probe oximeter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsouri et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: