Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Matters of intergenerational justice are fundamental to discussions of justice and climate change. This is the case for several reasons. We are confident that our emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) are having an effect on the global climate system. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) six different climate models in their Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) predict global mean temperature increases ranging from 1.8°C to 4.0°C during this century.1 This is projected to increase global mean sea levels by 0.18 to 0.59 meters.2 The attendant weather changes are less certain, as is how they will vary from region to region. But some of the effects that AR4 predicts as very likely include hotter high temperatures, more frequent heat waves, and greater precipitation in high latitudes. Effects that it estimates as likely include decreased precipitation in the subtropics and increased intensity of tropical cyclones.3 The Third Assessment Report (TAR) warns of a weakening of the thermohaline circulation and its possible abrupt shutdown after 2100.4 Unlike TAR, however, AR4 does not discuss the probabilities of severe or catastrophic adverse effects. But this absence is the subject of controversy among climate scientists, some of whom charge that politically motivated redactions to AR4 occurred.5 The effects of anthropogenic climate change will produce costs for persons in the future who will have to adapt to the changes. Crops will need to be changed or farmers will have to move. For many people food security will be threatened; some will go hungry as a result; other will starve. Homes and communities will need to be moved as sea levels rise. Some houses will be wiped out by sudden extreme storms. TAR stresses the disproportionate costs of adaptation for lower-income populations and the risks to populations in low-lying coastal regions and small islands. In general it predicts that, “[t]he impacts of climate change will fall disproportionately upon developing countries and the poor persons within all countries, and thereby exacerbate inequities in health status and access to adequate food, clean water, and other resources.”6 A recent study indicates that more than six hundred million people (ten percent of the world's population) live in low lying areas at higher risk to sea-level rises, and this amount is expected to increase as the urbanization of the global population continues.7 The effects of climate change and the costs of adapting to it can be mitigated by our policy choices. Such choices will produce mitigation costs for us as they will require significantly different energy production and use policies. Cleaner sources of energy are more expensive. The relative costs of the alternative sources of energy can be brought down by increasing the costs of using fossil fuels. But an increase in the absolute costs of energy is then guaranteed. It is highly unlikely that there will be significant mitigation without incurring such increased costs. The costs of adaptation and mitigation apply to a number of activities satisfying very important human interests, such as transportation, heating and cooling, shelter, food cultivation and production, security, income, government, and recreation. The assignment of the costs of mitigation and adaptation then is an important matter of justice. The matter of justice is between generations. It takes time to reduce global CO2 emissions. We have no experience of doing so yet. But even if we begin reducing, the IPCC projects that CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere will continue to increase in the absence of very large emissions reductions.8 TAR holds that “[s]tabilization of CO2 concentrations at any level requires the eventual reduction of global CO2 net emissions to a small fraction of the current level.”9 The level at CO2 concentrations are will the assignment of a higher level will mitigation costs higher costs. In any even after concentrations of temperature will continue to by a of a for a or and sea levels will continue to for many The of intergenerational justice are fundamental to an of justice and climate change in the absence of an of to future any global for the mitigation costs of climate change a such as that the as a to the will be It be on the relative that of a their without an be no that the it to future generations. a on this of intergenerational an CO2 however, in the of a In this for the of the intergenerational costs of climate change. on the is a for several reasons. The among how to to intergenerational and how to of the between the of and costs. of that are to a of a that intergenerational costs. In for the intergenerational assignment of the costs of climate it is important to in that CO2 emissions are not of adapting to or climate of transportation, and we will have to for that CO2 it is the case that the the activities that have CO2 have important and that we continue to and that future will reduction in costs for future will costs for the and and a reduction in for the and This is important for reasons. is that it is to the costs that future will from to the in that to to our The is that in the absence of a significant change in the global the future poor can be expected to in the of adaptation and we our to the costs of mitigation will likely be to who are In the a on the intergenerational that we without some of the assignment of the costs and of adaptation and The that the assignment of the costs of mitigation and adaptation are of justice significantly any of the assignment of the intergenerational costs of climate change. In to discuss different or that very will be in absolute the of the global and attendant severe will continue for the of the or that global and attendant severe are in the very in the time that it to at a on climate change and to the for at the of the CO2 emissions reduction the global is The or significant in and attendant such that by the of this the global is significantly more than it is the for the assignment of the intergenerational costs of climate energy policy produce an of the future costs and of CO2 emissions. energy policy produce a of future costs and of CO2 emissions that at the of and energy policy produce future costs of CO2 emissions to future is to the of costs to of the the of costs to that future persons have more absolute costs than This be if the that our to greater in the on and not absolute then the can the of be the of be in or to it in the is to for population to for this is to its to in the population is the such a of The or in of the number of people it be if who live are or have a of than who have of of of the that the the population But it is the of in the on intergenerational justice. of its on of the This is to in its or require to the of future and as a general that in as even to the of a if a of to be that to their for the of and that the will in have the to the on a of their more the costs that the to that at the of the of and of have need not that is to be by It is it to It takes the of future persons as for and of the for the of future persons the is the in poor people in the future are to be less poor and than who are The is that it of our It however, to in our are than it is to In of the of this this will be of the is a at It an by of in by the absence of of the of of to intergenerational justice there is such an that can our of the of in the of intergenerational justice and even is a of intergenerational In this of a and that is for begin the for in the of justice for the of the costs of climate change. The of an upon in to is to the from the in can the the global of climate an there is to of justice to the costs of CO2 emissions be in to from on the of their to the intergenerational of the of climate the have to on of however, the of of an that from on of different of the to different the controversy is to intergenerational justice then the for an for intergenerational of and all possible in the are all persons from the and all possible persons from all future generations. are subject to a of a of that of of is of and all in the are all persons from the and all future generations. are subject to a of a of that of of is time of in the are all persons from the are subject to a of a of that of the of the of they are all in are subject to the that they a that they as having The general of the is to so that the of the is and can be by who the of of of the be for different of justice. In to we not not to of can be on to the In we we out that not be to in the to its of the to from they not of In to of intergenerational justice be such we the of the of that not the In this are of they are or possible that on the that not can a different possible in we But we that, in the of the it be that we We on this it be to is to be a such as the that some people to as if they not their if we at the of the is the of It to be an or We the that we this is then possible persons no in the does not on the possible of in of the The is of the to This a on how the can be as to apply in other in does not not in the The is upon the that justice is to apply to the and the that a of the is that all and persons in any is a of the and if is then persons not in the not of of however, to the of the the of that they require us to the of and possible then to the of the This the of the by and But there to be no to at on this will different of energy production and the of different different people will have and the that We include future we an But any is in so as the that it are for as the of the are to our the of the charge is that in our how to in to our to future it no to that persons who will are it persons and persons who will however, to be this of the they not their the in the in all and people from this will people who are and future people who not who between the of persons and is will we can and that a out to be or on and not on is as that as from that future can be if our or as that are to their that the is on the that are not a future it to that it is in or to be than it is not in or to be this than that of in a future be a future is the in is In to the that that in our we future we can between our of who in will on the the that persons who will will be if it to be a of the that of the But this does not to be the For the persons or it does not then it possible future It the of the of the it persons from all then it is a the of persons of their from their is in on are that it is not that are in the But we persons to there will be no and we not then have a for the of does not to be a that as it future for in to we the the of the to have in as to the the of the for of intergenerational justice. to the other the so as to the other the does not from future generations. It does not the of possible future persons or of the by future In the time of the are of their in they other to be from the and an is by the that can its by generations. The important of this is that we in our intergenerational justice in by to that we it for to have an of how to intergenerational in to the of the of justice for the assignment of climate costs. In within an the on the are to the time of the of the subject to important not the of their in a that they as having all as are to the of of other generations. of costs for for whom they as the of the of the in the so and that in the there be on a of that from this to the be the In the and to their however, that out in the of and they to does the of in the case of In that in other that by future at as as they by the to costs of mitigation than does The between the can be as a between more mitigation costs to costs between or the possible of costs so as to that are possible in the But it is a between adaptation costs to or greater adaptation costs mitigated to that the as The to have mitigated their climate change adaptation costs. The to the costs of future climate change. other the in the the in the The are to the that they to have The are to this the and are to the they to the of the not there be no for A the not of of a the to be a for In it to that if we an and thereby that to there is to the of requires not climate change adaptation costs on future that are a greater of the than the of the mitigation costs for the In the this by to to the on that the that the that they to have any that the In that the that it on does not to our the of intergenerational The that does not in our intergenerational This however, to that the of a to the in to future not a of persons have persons to have not out if the not a to is out by the and to other as in costs on of the for the of future generations. The not be adequate if the to be at the of no future for whom they costs. In that no the they this is they as having But we of intergenerational justice we that we are not at the of we that, there be for us to and no to use the in any In the of of the of their in models It out on that they that there no It is important to that and not of This is by the of the that and of the are to the that in the absence of the general in is to as a to and to out be as the for the in by not as for that are of the is a of The of can be out by the in we that there will be future and the that there will not so that it to how we to the adaptation costs that we on to future generations. in on that it to an of intergenerational In the an it as of be the important in of that it is the that in of the In this the charge that it is by the in a of is if in of possible the number of people it be if who live are or have a of than who have This requires us to future the number of persons in the is to be the is not an of The or that is if people are for the is using as takes to to level of or more to of or more to the of that a is for the as in requires a of the in different the of the as and if the policy does not on such it the of different who live and have that it is a of that it is not an of of is to in the can be But changes in some energy production and who will live in the that for is in such For not future persons are without such persons not have that the no the no it does not require the of persons in different of be a its is in the of energy to in in the number of people It is not the of that the important for is the of is by the that to the of of in by that that are to We that we can have a to a or on the of an to a we have a to the costs of climate change adaptation for persons in future on the of some of or to persons in generations. This to future persons in a to of to to future persons are that are to our It be a of the however, to that it an of justice to future generations. The is to of the of the that the not of an between it does not to that of the have any to in having the of their Such no to that of the have to some of the to on to future But the is that we have a to such a and having it we then have a to But then the does not the it The it is to an of we have a to such a in the The of be by to future as to in of a to It is then to the that apply to a of then it is by the holds that it is if people are for the to is as a of It the in of are all other between of more than if is in the than the the of or and is not in this of But it is more to as to This can be by that is a in a that it is to is we can is as to is that an is if the of that it persons than an alternative this if not is at in a the of is a it that an can be even if it is not that produce the of This can be if for a we the to the that the emissions of CO2 are future persons have an to of the costs of climate even if the costs for persons have by of such as that does not that are if persons are It is not in that if is a this does not that it is not a of for it is not that But the of does not to the that in The on it requires the of the persons in different But as a for the of or does not require a between as they are and as they have it is not subject to the of The of does not require such a it persons as their of the costs of climate change to their is greater than that of the not greater or than some other possible that persons have us a not to CO2 that persons of the costs of CO2 emissions is greater than our The in case is to costs of different not the costs that the persons or have in some other In it be that the that they require a can be any that by their on to their or to they are to of the it on or is the that persons are at a to a possible of in persons not have of the is as a of the or as a to in Such are by the a for that persons are by climate change is by the The of this in effect the of to include It is a is it be the case that there is an alternative or in the persons not be this as for not the or it the of however, are and of or that not the it be the that is not It to that they are they are for This requires that the of the of the to in the be But the does not that the will be the persons This is on how the takes as who are in of and to less and in in less It is significant that of is In other a is in any of upon how the of and different different people be if we to an its possible alternative that very different the and the possible alternative persons be The us to the of different not the people in different of the be an of justice. it is But it is significant that the controversy that it is it the are It is to how the such controversy if it is But if is then an intergenerational need not different of the persons in to that persons have by CO2 emissions. the that costs between different persons does not it there is of it is not however, to the In to the does not not that that of on a to from by the or the of among In of effects on future be the be on this But it is not the case that future persons are who greater costs of climate change than we our For they not have for does not the of in any so it is to the that of the absence of is not there is no for the or by that is an a or however, it that persons who their to that to a or requires the that it and the that the of have without then the case of of the in the during the time of not have for the of This is to of we the of such as the to very many of not The of people in the at the time of to have a even they not for This is to persons who that their of climate costs is The that in the case of any not for this does not from it to have an and from it in that Such in not to be The for so to be that that are to interests, that is the of that the of the of does not is in in the the are an not an to the is not to they can it even they not have for the The in the case of a not that a that for the not But the is more or less the does not to be a that in some the have a if the that to not it does not to matter that of the that not have to is a to be in a to that a a and that a if not for the the that the not It is a of an of that it is persons the But if upon the a that the not an of that such a as is the is the that to in it is not to such It is a for as that in the future persons are less than the number of other persons have if different CO2 emissions. persons have and in and are to the of to the they the there is a out for it is by that a the of upon of this out be by as the is not that persons who not for a experience that they and they there is no But it is to the of the be a of there an This is not a of to for the not need to the that have their in for the to be the of in of not that if to the it is less of the of to be a of some of or is that be by the that they from the a of among some of as having does not of a that holds to have In the of does not require to other possible of in the persons have it is not by the it is not for persons to that the to they their is even if we that they to have not this does not a to a of it does not to be the case that the absence of on the of who have the not the does not the that is to The in does not the in and of of is the case the of their In the case of there are no that there is no to that the that is the their in a that on we that the on the of they are that and can be expected to continue to of is But greater on the than does mitigation costs are not costs to global however, the of But the mitigation costs if they fall disproportionately on the the other adaptation costs can to reduce the of future if adaptation costs to the future to as they to have a to that be the adaptation costs in the brought by greater mitigation costs in the will other the of the costs of mitigation is likely to be the costs are of The poor of the are likely to disproportionately to the future costs. this is likely to be the case in as the is that the of future adaptation costs will more justice than will the of reduction of the of the costs of mitigation that will be than the of the costs that the future will for even if the costs are This is for reasons. In the future there will be a of the world's population that is and the assignment of costs a more be less likely to if we a to reduce severe the matter of the costs of mitigation The on mitigation are to reduce current severe the on the of they that in this For it on have of poor This more of who than persons in to reduce costs for costs they are to the reduction of of higher they have to to the The is that such costs produce greater the likely of greater the to it is by no that there is an to the of be on the of in the absence of more the It upon how the to by that more and thereby adaptation costs in to that have mitigated less to be This that the of and the of the But we be how without significantly more the there a global to be by the mitigation of climate then there be some in of In such in other are the of poor persons in the it to require less to the mitigation of the costs of climate change. that a of an of justice is its the to it can our at and In the case of of the for the of the intergenerational costs of climate policy require future costs. we are to be by the of we will have to of the likely future costs and of in to to the likely to costs. Such will be highly and go if they less But there is no to be so as to that will not important is in that our at have But we are in an to of intergenerational justice. We they will be We our in of our will be to our We however, how and have in the and we can more the of the climate system. We our of the likely of our will we will be the of that we have we can some that we are doing as we to and that there will be people who will be for our if we of this the at and and the in at to the in all of discussions for to by the many that from and the several that we on this by the and the at on it from the the of the at it at the of a at the for by the of the for to all of for their
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Darrel Moellendorf (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: