Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Estuaries are considered valuable regions, both socio-economically and ecologically. The gradients in physical characteristics like salinity present result in a high biodiversity, while the provision of many ecosystem services have attracted human settlement and activity. Human activities and estuarine biodiversity are often at odds with each others, leading to socio-ecological trade-offs in decision- and policy-making in which the ecological perspective is generally underrepresented. In this study, we implemented a hydrodynamic model to explore the socio-ecological implications of reopening the closed-off Haringvliet estuary in the Netherlands. Our socio-ecological evaluation considers the trade-off between freshwater availability and ecological diversity. In the case of the Haringvliet, we have shown that partially opening the gates enhances diversity in the system against no — or limited — loss of freshwater availability. All in all, the use of representative (non-monetary) performance indicators for the considered stakeholders allowed us to demonstrate the trade-offs in a clear fashion: the Pareto-front resulting from these performance indicators is an intuitive visualization for decision- and policy-makers as well as the communication to the public.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hendrickx et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: