In this and the two following papers II and III we study the axisymmetric collision of two black holes at the speed of light, with a view to understanding the more realistic collision of two black holes with a large but finite incoming Lorentz factor {γ}. The curved radiative region of the space-time, produced after the two incoming impulsive plane-fronted shock waves have collided, is treated using perturbation theory, following earlier work by Curtis and Chapman. The collision is viewed in a frame to which a large Lorentz boost has been applied, giving a strong shock with energy {ν} off which a weak shock with energy {λ}{}{ν} scatters. This yields a singular perturbation problem, in which the Einstein field equations are solved by expanding in powers of {λ}/{ν} around flat space-time. When viewed back in the center-of-mass frame, this gives a good description of the regions of the space-time in which gravitational radiation propagates at small angles {θ}^ but a large distance from the symmetry axis, near each shock as it continues to propagate, having been distorted and deflected in the initial collision. The news function c₀({τ}^,{θ}^) describing the gravitational radiation is expected to have a convergent series expansion c₀({τ}^,{θ}^) =tsumₙ₌₀^∞{a}₂ₙ(τ⁾{sin}²ⁿθ^, where τ^ is a retarded time coordinate. First-order perturbation theory gives an expression for{a}₀(τ⁾ in agreement with that found previously by studying the finite-γ collisions. Second-order perturbation theory gives{a}₂$({τ}^) as a complicated integral expression.A new mass-loss formula is derived, which shows that if the end result of the collision is a single Schwarzschild black hole at rest, plus gravitational radiation which is (in a certain precise sense) accurately described by the above series for c₀({τ}^,{θ}^), then the final mass can be determined from knowledge only of a₀({τ}^) and a₂({τ}^). This leads to an interesting test of the cosmic censorship hypothesis. The numerical calculation of a₂({τ}^) is made practicable by analytical simplifications described in the following paper II, where the perturbative field equations are reduced to a system in only two independent variables. Results are presented in the concluding paper III, which discusses the implications for the energy emitted and the nature of the radiative space-time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D’Eath et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: