Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Subjects in three experiments gave their opinions as to the emotional meaning of various words in terms of categorical inclusion as an emotion (yes, no), a rating scale of emotional impact, and frequency of citation in an open-ended emotion-naming task. Subjects' responses were correlated with several scores based on the Dictionary of Affect. A word was more likely to be called an emotion or rated highly on emotional impact when it had a high value of Arousal and a high or low value for Pleasantness. In two of the three experiments, distance from the origin in Evaluation-Activation space was also a significant predictor of responding. Correlations supporting these conclusions ranged from low to medium magnitude.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Whissell et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: