More Bang for Fewer Bucks? Or How Local Governments Can Rediscover the Potentials (And Pitfalls) of the Market

ActionsWashington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, April 1979), p. vii. 22. Idem. 23. See Jerome B. McKinney, Influence of Lower Level Officials on Policy Making, delivered at the American Society for Public Administration Conference, Denver, Colorado, April 19-21, 1972; see Robert T. Golembiewski, Men, Management and Morality (New York: McGraw Hill, 1965). 24. Idem. 25. Stenberg, op. cit., p. 13. 26. Idem. 27. See Catherine Lovell, Coordinating Grants from Below, Public Administration Review, Vol. 39 (September/October 1979), p. 438. 28. See Effectiveness Auditing (Stockholm, Sweden: The Swedish National Audit Bureau, 1971), Chapter 4. 29. Where Does All the Money Go (Dayton, Ohio: Charles F. Kettering Foundation, n.d.). 30. Stenberg, loc. cit. 31. The information to be generated from resarch and development is akin in some respects to the fiscal note procedure now practiced in some states. It requires that proposed laws affecting other units of government indicate such impact prior to its passage. For an extensive discussion of this topic see House of Representatives, State and Local Government Cost Estimate Act (HR 3697), Hearings Task Force of Budget Process and Task Force on Local Government, Committee on the Budget, HR, 96th Congress, June 28, 1979. 32. Marc Bendick, Jr., A Management Analysis Process for Public Assistanced (Quality Control) (Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute, 1979, p. 1 (monograph).