The effect of autophosphorylation on the tyrosine kinase activity of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is not well understood. We previously demonstrated that phospholipase C-gamma physically associates with the EGF-activated EGFR, but not with a kinase-negative mutant of the EGFR, and, moreover, that only the tyrosine-phosphorylated EGFR is able to associate with phospholipase C-gamma. We have now investigated the effect of autophosphorylation on the tyrosine kinase activity of the EGFR by employing the purified kinase-active intracellular domain of the EGFR (EGFR-IC) produced by a baculovirus expression system. Synthetic peptides, including ones which contain the individual major tyrosine phosphorylation sites of phospholipase C-gamma, were used as substrates. We found that the extensively prephosphorylated EGFR-IC exhibited similar reaction kinetics to the unphosphorylated EGFR-IC when angiotensin II was used as a nonspecific substrate. In contrast there was a clear stimulation of kinase activity due to autophosphorylation of the EGFR-IC when peptides representing either the major autophosphorylation site of the EGFR or the EGFR phosphorylation sites of phospholipase C-gamma were used as substrates. However, the modes of stimulation for these peptides differed. The binding affinity (Km) for the unphosphorylated EGFR-IC for the peptide containing Tyr-771 of phospholipase C-gamma was relatively poor compared with other peptides, but improved 5-6-fold when the EGFR-IC was prephosphorylated. On the other hand, autophosphorylation improved the reaction velocity (Vm) of the phosphorylation of other peptides by 2-3-fold, with little or no increase in affinity. These results suggest that autophosphorylation of the EGFR may induce a conformational change of its kinase domain which enhances its kinase activity with exogenous substrates and may induce association with phospholipase C-gamma by increasing its affinity to a domain containing Tyr-771.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hsu et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: