Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study investigates counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in organizations through a systematic literature review of 61 articles published between 2014 and 2024, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to ensure methodological rigor. Thematic and hypothesis network analyses were employed to identify key factors contributing to CWB. The main findings indicate that distributive and procedural justice and personality traits such as neuroticism and emotional stability are significant predictors of CWB. This study provides a novel contribution by highlighting the critical role of daily interactions between supervisors and subordinates in shaping justice perceptions and moderating employees’ emotional responses. Practical steps recommended for organizations include equitable resource distribution, transparent decision-making processes, and enhanced communication between supervisors and employees. Emotional intelligence training for supervisors can further help reduce negative emotional responses and mitigate the risk of CWB. Moreover, this study encourages exploring cross-cultural perspectives to better understand how cultural differences influence justice perceptions and engagement in CWB across diverse workplace environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Indrawiani et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: