This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
A conjecture recently began to materialize in the GIScience and spatial statistics literature asserting that many georeferenced attribute random variables (RVs) contain a positive–negative spatial autocorrelation (SA) mixture, rather than the widely recognized purely positive SA based upon routine cursory observation. Another newly emerging supposition maintains that, after controlling for the already well‐known tendency for SA to increase with increasingly fine geographic resolutions, georeferenced socio‐economic/demographic attribute RVs have roughly the same magnitude of positive SA as that degree frequently computed for remotely sensed pixel data, an extent suppressed in its net amount by the negative SA in a variable's mixture. This article, the first of a two‐part series, summarizes research exploring these two propositions using population density as a common georeferenced RV across a diverse set of geographic landscapes. The principal population density findings support these two suppositions. Part II presents parallel analyses for a wide range of georeferenced RVs across the same set of geographic landscapes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Griffith et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: