Why the study?
Real-world evidence from electronic medical records is increasingly prevalent, but how best to ascertain cardiovascular outcomes from these records is unknown.
Does commercially available natural language processing software accurately identify bleeding events from electronic medical records in patients with atrial fibrillation and cancer?
Does commercially available natural language processing software accurately identify bleeding events from electronic medical records in patients with atrial fibrillation and cancer?
Commercially available NLP software demonstrated variable positive predictive value for identifying bleeding events from clinical notes, suggesting it can improve screening efficiency but still requires human validation.
NLP may streamline bleeding screening in AF-cancer EMRs but variable PPV requires human oversight; leaves open optimal deployment thresholds.
Background Real-world evidence derived from the electronic medical record (EMR) is increasingly prevalent. How best to ascertain cardiovascular outcomes from EMRs is unknown. We sought to validate a commercially available natural language processing (NLP) software to extract bleeding events. Methods We included patients with atrial fibrillation and cancer seen at our cancer center from 1/1/2016 to 12/31/2019. A query set based on SNOMED CT expressions was created to represent bleeding from 11 different organ systems. We ran the query against the clinical notes and randomly selected a sample of notes for physician validation. The primary outcome was the positive predictive value (PPV) of the software to identify bleeding events stratified by organ system. Results We included 1370 patients with mean age 72 years old (SD 1.5) and 35% female. We processed 66,130 notes; the NLP software identified 6522 notes including 654 unique patients with possible bleeding events. Among 1269 randomly selected notes, the PPV of the software ranged from 0.921 for neurologic bleeds to 0.571 for OB/GYN bleeds. Patterns related to false positive bleeding events identified by the software included historic bleeds, hypothetical bleeds, missed negatives, and word errors. Conclusions NLP may provide an alternative for population-level screening for bleeding outcomes in cardiovascular studies. Human validation is still needed, but an NLP-driven screening approach may improve efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Walker et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: