This paper extends J effrey T hieme's article “ T he W orld's T op I nnovation M anagement S cholars and T heir S ocial C apital,” published in 2007 in J P I M , in which he made a ranking of the world's top innovation managements scholars. This paper makes four contributions. First, this paper includes data on innovation management from articles published in two leading innovation management journals and eight top management and marketing journals during past 20 years (1991–2010). Second, this paper classifies 1229 articles into 29 categories, revealing hot topics and future research directions. Third, this paper ranks 1718 innovation management scholars over a period of 20 years from 1991 to 2010. Fourth, this is the first time that 625 universities have been ranked in terms of their current faculty research capabilities in the field of innovation management. The empirical data from the past 20 years show that the world's top 10 innovation management scholars are: M ichael S ong ( U niversity of M issouri‐ K ansas C ity), R oger J . C alantone ( M ichigan S tate U niversity), E rik J an H ultink ( D elft U niversity of T echnology), M ark E . P arry ( U niversity of M issouri‐ K ansas C ity), K waku A tuahene‐ G ima ( C hina E urope I nternational B usiness S chool), C . A nthony D i B enedetto (Temple U niversity), A bbie G riffin ( U niversity of U tah), W illiam E . S ouder ( R etired), B arry L . B ayus ( U niversity of N orth C arolina at C hapel H ill), and C hristoph H . Loch ( INSEAD ). The world's top 10 innovation management universities are: U niversity of M issouri‐ K ansas C ity, M assachusetts I nstitute of T echnology, M ichigan S tate U niversity, INSEAD , H arvard U niversity, U niversity of P ennsylvania, N ortheastern U niversity, T exas A&M U niversity, S tanford U niversity, and D elft U niversity of T echnology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: