Why the study?
It was unclear to what extent machine learning has been used with EEG and ECG physiological data to further understand physiological responses associated with PTSD.
How are machine learning methodologies used with EEG and ECG data to understand physiological responses associated with PTSD?
How are machine learning methodologies used with EEG and ECG data to understand physiological responses associated with PTSD?
Machine learning applied to EEG and ECG data shows promise in identifying clinically relevant diagnostic biomarkers for PTSD.
May inform PTSD diagnostic tools; leaves open prospective validation of classical ML EEG/ECG biomarkers.
The enigma of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is embedded in a complex array of physiological responses to stressful situations that result in disruptions in arousal and cognitions that characterise the psychological disorder. Deciphering these physiological patterns is complex, which has seen the use of machine learning (ML) grow in popularity. However, it is unclear to what extent ML has been used with physiological data, specifically, the electroencephalogram (EEG) and electrocardiogram (ECG) to further understand the physiological responses associated with PTSD. To better understand the use of EEG and ECG biomarkers, with and without ML, a scoping review was undertaken. A total of 124 papers based on adult samples were identified comprising 19 ML studies involving EEG and ECG. A further 21 studies using EEG data, and 84 studies employing ECG meeting all other criteria but not employing ML were included for comparison. Identified studies indicate classical ML methodologies currently dominate EEG and ECG biomarkers research, with derived biomarkers holding clinically relevant diagnostic implications for PTSD. Discussion of the emerging trends, algorithms used and their success is provided, along with areas for future research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rountree-Harrison et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: