Why the study?
Coronary microvascular dysfunction frequently causes ischemia without obstructive epicardial disease but remains underdiagnosed and underused diagnostic tools leave patients without specific treatment.
Does invasive assessment of coronary microcirculation improve diagnosis and symptoms in patients with ischemia and non-obstructive coronary artery disease?
Does invasive assessment of coronary microcirculation improve diagnosis and symptoms in patients with ischemia and non-obstructive coronary artery disease?
Invasive assessment of coronary microcirculation is underutilized but can significantly improve diagnosis and guide therapy for patients with ischemia and non-obstructive coronary artery disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support full physiology assessment in INOCA; hypothesis-generating and leaves open randomized confirmation.
A significant proportion of patients presenting with signs and symptoms of myocardial ischemia have no "significant" epicardial disease; thereby, the assessment of coronary microcirculation gained an important role in improving diagnosis and guiding therapy. In fact, coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) could be found in a large proportion of these patients, supporting both symptoms and signs of myocardial ischemia. However, CMD represents a diagnostic challenge for two main reasons: (1) the small dimension of the coronary microvasculature prevents direct angiographic visualization, and (2) despite the availability of specific diagnostic tools, they remain invasive and underused in the current clinical practice. For these reasons, CMD remains underdiagnosed, and most of the patients remain with no specific treatment and quality-of-life-limiting symptoms. Of note, recent evidence suggests that a "full physiology" approach for the assessment of the whole coronary vasculature may offer a significant benefit in terms of symptom improvement among patients presenting with ischemia and non-obstructive coronary artery disease. We analyze the pathophysiology of coronary microvascular dysfunction, providing the readers with a guide for the invasive assessment of coronary microcirculation, together with the available evidence supporting its use in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ciaramella et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: