PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 30, 2026Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science0 citationsOpen Access

Comparison of hemoglobin variability between short- and intermediate-acting erythropoiesis-stimulating agents: a retrospective cohort study

DPDa Eun ParkHCHae Dong ChoiYPYoung Eun Park

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare hemoglobin variability associated with short- and intermediate-acting erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in hemodialysis patients.
  • Retrospective cohort study involving 119 patients on maintenance hemodialysis.
  • Patients classified into two groups: short-acting ESA (epoetin) and intermediate-acting ESA (darbepoetin).
  • Hemoglobin levels measured 11 times over 40 weeks to assess variability using established metrics.
  • Mean hemoglobin levels were comparable in both ESA groups.
  • Standard deviation in hemoglobin was 0.67±0.19 g/dL for epoetin and 0.69±0.22 g/dL for darbepoetin (p=0.516).
  • Coefficient of variation was 0.06%±0.02% for epoetin and 0.07%±0.02% for darbepoetin (p=0.480), with no significant differences in variance.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aims to compare the effects of short- and intermediate-acting erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) on hemoglobin (Hb) variability in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 119 patients who were classified into two groups based on ESA type: short-acting ESA (epoetin alfa/beta EPO, n=48) and intermediate-acting ESA (darbepoetin alfa DPO, n=71). Hb levels were measured 11 times at 4-week intervals from ESA therapy initiation to 40 weeks of follow-up. This study used established metrics from previous research, including standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), and residual SD, to quantify Hb variability. RESULTS: Over the 40-week study period with 4-week measurement intervals, mean Hb levels were comparable between the two ESA groups. In the EPO and DPO groups, SD was 0.67±0.19 g/dL and 0.69±0.22 g/dL, respectively (p=0.516), CV was 0.06%±0.02% and 0.07%±0.02%, respectively (p=0.480), and residual SD was 0.73±0.21 g/dL and 0.76±0.26 g/dL, respectively (p=0.463). No significant differences in Hb variability were observed between the groups over 40 weeks using SD, CV, and residual SD. CONCLUSION: This retrospective cohort study showed comparable mean Hb levels and Hb variability indices between groups. With respect to Hb variability, the findings reveal no clear basis for prioritizing either short-acting or intermediate-acting ESA.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Park et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a7e2f0307b78509430faahttps://doi.org/10.12701/jyms.2026.43.36
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparative Safety of Long‐Acting vs. Short‐Acting Erythropoiesis‐Stimulating Agents Among Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis2024 · 3 citations
  2. 2Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Darbepoetin Alfa versus Epoetin Alfa in the Treatment of Anemia in Pediatric Patients on Regular Hemodialysis2024
  3. 3Evaluating treatment strategies for managing anaemia with erythropoiesis stimulating agent therapy in haemodialysis patients: findings from a target trial emulation using electronic health record data2025
  4. 4Switch from epoetin to darbepoetin alfa in hemodialysis: dose equivalence and hemoglobin stability2014 · 8 citations
  5. 5The cost-benefit of utilizing post-dialysis haemoglobin for dosing of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent therapy in patients with anaemia on haemodialysis in a low-resource setting2026