Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review examines carbon nanotubes for gene editing in crops, highlighting their potential for improved transformation efficiency.
Global population growth and climate change intensify the demand for sustainable crop improvement, thereby driving innovation in plant genetic transformation technologies. Conventional methods, including Agrobacterium -mediated transformation and biolistics, remain limited by host specificity, low transformation efficiency, tissue-culture dependence, and random DNA integration. Recently, nanomaterials, particularly carbon nanotubes (CNTs), have emerged as promising vehicles for biomolecule delivering into plant cells owing to their ability to penetrate the cell wall, transport diverse cargo, and enabling transient delivery without necessarily requiring genome integration. In this review, we examine the potential of CNT-based platforms to overcome existing transformation barriers, enable transient delivery of DNA, RNA, and proteins, and expand gene-editing to recalcitrant crops with particular emphasis on CRISPR-Cas9 delivery in plasmid DNA, mRNA, and ribonucleoprotein (RNP) formats, that may facilitate DNA-free genome editing. We also systematically discuss CNT synthesis, functionalization strategies, and structure-activity relationships that govern delivery efficiency, alongside a comparative analysis of established transformation methods. In addition, we assess the temporal and economic viability of CNT platforms and evaluate the evolving global regulatory landscape for nanomaterial-mediated crop editing. We conclude that CNT-mediated delivery represents a promising tool for sustainable crop engineering, though broader adoption will require standardized biosafety protocols, life-cycle assessment, and harmonized regulatory pathways to address nanotoxicological and environmental concerns.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: