Key result
Concurrent elevations in WHtR and SBP linked to ~68% higher incident CVD risk.
Why the study?
Traditional cardiovascular risk assessment tools often require laboratory testing, which can limit implementation in community settings.
Does the combination of elevated waist-to-height ratio and systolic blood pressure predict incident cardiovascular disease in middle-aged and older adults?
Cohort (n=6,770)
Yes
Does the combination of elevated waist-to-height ratio and systolic blood pressure predict incident cardiovascular disease in middle-aged and older adults?
Combined waist-to-height ratio and systolic blood pressure categories offer a simple, low-cost approach for community-based cardiovascular risk stratification in middle-aged and older adults.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Elevated WHtR associated with higher CVD risk in older adults; hypothesis-generating for combined WHtR-SBP assessment.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of global mortality. Early identification of individuals at higher risk of CVD is important for prevention and management. Traditional cardiovascular risk assessment approaches often require laboratory testing and related infrastructure, which may limit their implementation in community settings. This prospective cohort study examined the association of combined waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) categories with incident CVD in middle-aged and older adults. We analyzed 6,770 adults aged ≥ 45 years without baseline CVD from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS, 2011–2018). Participants were categorized by WHtR (≥ 0.5/<0.5) and SBP (≥ 140/<140 mmHg). Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess associations with incident CVD, adjusting for sociodemographic, lifestyle, and metabolic covariates. Over 7 years of follow-up, 1,384 CVD events occurred. Elevated WHtR alone (HR = 1.271, 95% CI: 1.111–1.455) and elevated SBP alone (HR = 1.392, 95% CI: 1.240–1.564) were each associated with a higher risk of incident CVD. Participants with concurrent elevations in WHtR and SBP had a 68.2% higher risk of incident CVD (HR = 1.682, 95% CI: 1.417–1.996) compared with those with normal values. These associations remained consistent across subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Combined WHtR and SBP categories may offer a simple, low-cost approach for community-based cardiovascular risk stratification in middle-aged and older adults. Requiring only a tape measure and a sphygmomanometer, this approach may help identify individuals at higher risk of incident CVD in settings where laboratory testing is less accessible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Incident cardiovascular disease (n=6,770). Concurrent elevation of waist-to-height ratio (≥0.5) and systolic blood pressure (≥140 mmHg) vs. Normal waist-to-height ratio (<0.5) and systolic blood pressure (<140 mmHg) was evaluated on Incident cardiovascular disease (HR 1.682, 95% CI 1.417-1.996). Concurrent elevations in waist-to-height ratio (≥0.5) and systolic blood pressure (≥140 mmHg) were associated with a 68.2% higher risk of incident cardiovascular disease (HR 1.682).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: