Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis of treatment trends and survival outcomes in splenic marginal zone lymphoma, indicating significant changes over time.
e19096 Background: Splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) is a rare, indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma with heterogeneous clinical behavior and evolving treatment paradigms. Population-level data on management patterns and long-term outcomes remain limited. We analyzed trends in treatment utilization and survival outcomes for patients with SMZL using a large, nationally representative cohort. Methods: Patients diagnosed with SMZL between 2000-2022 were identified from the SEER database. Demographic, clinical, and treatment variables, including age, sex, race/ethnicity, grade, Ann Arbor stage, splenectomy, chemotherapy, and survival outcomes were extracted. Treatment eras were categorized as 2000-2007, 2008-2015, and 2016-2022. Kaplan–Meier methods estimated overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Cox proportional hazards models evaluated prognostic factors. Results: A total of 2,641 patients were included (median age 67 years; 45% male; 89% white; 91% non-Hispanic). Advanced-stage disease (III–IV) was present in 42.8%. Observation was the most common treatment strategy (48.3%), followed by chemotherapy (21.3%), splenectomy (17.9%), and combined therapy (4.5%). Treatment patterns varied significantly across eras (p < 0.001), with declining splenectomy use and increased adoption of systemic therapy. Median OS was 134 months. OS rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 91.4%, 74.0%, and 54.6%, respectively. The 10-year CSS was 76.3%, with a lymphoma-specific mortality rate of 18.7%. In multivariable analysis, age ≥75 years was strongly associated with inferior OS (HR 11.01, p <0.001), as were male sex (HR 1.18; p <0.05) and stage III disease (HR 1.76; p<0.05). Diagnosis in the 2008-2015 era was associated with improved survival compared with 2000–2007 (HR 0.76, p < 0.001). Combined splenectomy + chemotherapy was associated with increased mortality risk (HR 1.63, p < 0.001). Splenectomy showed a modest unadjusted OS benefit (p = 0.011), but this was not significant after adjustment (p = 0.788). Conclusions: In our study, SMZL demonstrated excellent long-term disease-specific survival but substantial age-related mortality. Treatment patterns evolved significantly over two decades, with decreasing reliance on splenectomy. Advanced age, male sex, and higher stage were independent predictors of worse outcomes. Combined splenectomy + chemotherapy was associated with inferior survival, underscoring the need for careful treatment selection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abhinav et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: