Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article proposes a new framework for understanding computational fairness in data analysis, indicating the importance of equal predictive values across demographic groups.
This article outlines a new framework of computational fairness for the analysis of data-driven statistical discrimination. It begins by identifying the limitations of the still dominant paradigm of fairness through unawareness . Building on this critique, the article proposes an approach that distinguishes concerns of procedural fairness from questions of distributive justice when evaluating potentially discriminatory procedures. In contrast to a widespread view, it argues that procedural computational fairness rests on a single formal criterion. A computational procedure is non-discriminatory, it is claimed, if it achieves equal predictive values across demographic groups. In addition, two non-procedural requirements of distributive justice are advanced for selective procedures: the proportionality of individual burdens and their compatibility with a just overall social distribution of benefits and burdens.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wilfried Hinsch (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: