Demonstrates efficient FDCA–H2 production in electrocatalytic systems, suggesting new design approaches.
A key challenge in electrocatalytic biomass conversion is the unresolved synergy between terminal hydroxyl (µ 1 ‐OH) and bridged lattice oxygen (µ 2 ‐O) species in metal oxide materials. This work unravels the distinct functions of these two electrophilic oxygen species for paired 2,5‐furandicarboxylic acid (FDCA)–H 2 electrosynthesis by systematically investigating their catalytic behavior in 5‐hydroxymethylfurfural oxidation (HMFOR) at electrochemically reconstructed MO x /NF interfaces. Decoupling the electrochemical–chemical steps of HMFOR reveals that this reaction is governed primarily by µ 1 ‐OH–M n+δ with rapid µ 2 ‐O regeneration, whereas hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) proceeds via µ 2 ‐O‐promoted water dissociation. The outstanding performance of each catalyst aligns with its surface speciation. Ni(OH) x O y /NF, featuring a µ 1 ‐OH‐rich surface, delivers a 97% FDCA yield with 99% Faradaic efficiency for HMFOR. Conversely, CuO x /NF, enriched with µ 2 ‐O, exhibits superior HER activity ( η 10 = 0.16 V, Tafel slope 46 mV dec −1 ). Leveraging these complementary structure–property relationships, an integrated NiO/NF||CuO x /NF electrolyzer achieves highly efficient FDCA–H 2 co‐production. This study establishes a material design framework for managing paired electrosynthesis through electrophilic oxygen synergy at reconstructed metal oxide interfaces.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: