Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective multicenter trial investigates outcomes in metastatic prostate cancer based on genomic profiles, indicating the need for better testing.
e17042 Background: AVPC (≥ 2 alterations in PTEN / TP53 / RB1 ) and MMR-d are genomically distinct subsets of prostate cancer with poor response to androgen-pathway therapies (ARPi) and docetaxel (DTx). Methods: This prospective RW multicenter study (Alberta, Canada) investigates the incidence, characteristics, systemic treatment (tx), and outcomes of pts with metastatic (m) and/or castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) receiving genomic testing (2018-2025). Pts with AVPC or MMR-d were compared with pts with no biomarker detected (NBD: lacking AVPC, MMR-d and HRD). Pt characteristics, time to CRPC (tCRPC) from androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) initiation, survival post-mCRPC (OS), time to PSA progression (TTPP), and radiographic PFS (rPFS) were assessed using univariate tests of association and Kaplan-Meier analyses. Results: Of 178 cases, 19 (12%) were AVPC (18 PTEN, 4 RB1, 17 TP53), 19 (12%) MMR-d (4 EPCAM, 3 MLH1, 6 MSH2, 6 MSH6, 2 PMS2), and 140 (76%) NBD. HRD was observed concurrently in 42% (8/19) each of AVPC [ATM/PTEN/TP53 (n = 2); BRCA2/PTEN/TP53 (n = 3); BRCA2/TP53/RB1 (n = 2); PALB2/PTEN/TP53 (n = 1); RAD51C/TP53/RB1 (n = 1)] and MMR-d [ATM/MLH (n = 1); ATM/EPCAM/MSH6 (n = 1); BRCA2/MSH6 (n = 1); BRCA2/MSH2 (n = 2); CDK12/MSH6 (n = 1); CDK12/MSH2 (n = 1); 1 PALB2/MSH6 (n = 1)]. Excluding concurrent HRD, 11 AVPC (11 PTEN, 2 RB1, 9 TP53), 11 MMR-d (3 EPCAM, 1 MLH1, 2 MSH2, 4 MSH6, 2 PMS2), and 140 NBD were analyzed. Concurrent HRD did not impact tCRPC or OS for AVPC or MMR-d. Clinicopathological features (age, Gleason ≥8, disease volume, visceral or de novo metastases, pathology, PSA) were similar across groups. tCRPC was 16.6, 18.4 and 29.9 mo for AVPC, MMR-d and NBD, respectively (p = 0.6). AVPC had a significantly shorter OS (11.9 mo), compared to MMR-d (13.6 mo) and NBD (37 mo); p < 0.01). 97/178 pts with mCSPC received treatment intensification (66 ARPi [26 APA; 31 ABI; 9 ENZA), 19 ARPi + DTx [8 ABI; 11 DARO], and 12 DTx). 1L mCRPC tx consisted of 82% (41/50) ARPi [2 APA; 20 ABI; 19 ENZA), 16% (8/51) DTx, and 2% (1/50) platinum chemotherapy (P). 2L for mCRPC pts was 77% (39/55) DTx, 24% (13/55) ARPi [6 ABI; 7 ENZA], 3% (2/55) cabazitaxel, and 2% (1/55) P. Conclusions: This RW study identified a high proportion of pts harbouring AVPC or MMR-d were also concurrently HRD. Yet, AVPC is a distinct aggressive subtype with poor outcomes, demonstrating a short OS and tCRPC, and rapid TTPP and rPFS on both ARPi and Dtx. No pts received AKT inhibitors and a single pt with MMR-d (PMS2) received a self-funded immune checkpoint inhibitor, underlining the need for earlier comprehensive biomarker testing in M1 or CRPC and further trial development in these unique subtypes. AVPC n (%) MMR-dn (%) NBDn (%) p 1L Single Agent ARPi N 9/11(81) 8/11 (72) 90/126 (71) 0.3 TTPP 8.3 14.8 26.6 <0.01* R-PFS 8.2 10.3 21.4 <0.01* 2L DTx N 4/7 (57) 5/6 (83) 34/47 (72) 0.8 TTPP 1.4 11.1 10.2 <0.01* R-PFS 4.2 3.0 7.1 0.5
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yip et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: