Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This in silico analysis uncovers co-expression patterns in solid tumors to support bispecific ADC design, suggesting enhanced therapeutic potential.
e15036 Background: Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are an established therapeutic modality in solid tumors, although tumor heterogeneity and antigen loss can limit response durability. Bispecific ADCs targeting two tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) represent a promising strategy to improve tumor selectivity and potentially mitigate resistance mechanisms, and integrative in silico analyses may help inform the prioritization of biologically plausible TAA pairs. Methods: TAAs corresponding to ADCs approved by the FDA and/or EMA for solid tumors were selected as reference targets, including HER2, TROP2, NECTIN4, Tissue Factor, FOLR1 and c-MET. Gene expression correlations with an extended panel of clinically relevant TAAs were assessed using TIMER 3.0 across TCGA solid tumors. High-confidence associations were defined using a Spearman correlation coefficient ≥0.7, with tumor types annotated using standard TCGA nomenclature. Results: High-confidence co-expression patterns were identified between selected reference TAAs and an extended panel of TAAs across TCGA solid tumors; correlations observed in more than one tumor type were considered recurrent and are summarized in Table 1. HER2 showed recurrent high-confidence co-expression with ERBB3, together with additional tumor-specific associations. TROP2 and NECTIN4 displayed overlapping recurrent co-expression patterns with multiple partner antigens, alongside additional tumor-specific correlations. In contrast, Tissue Factor and FOLR1 exhibited exclusively tumor-specific high-confidence associations. c-MET demonstrated recurrent co-expression with several partner antigens, together with tumor-specific associations. Conclusions: This integrative in silico analysis identifies high-confidence co-expression patterns between clinically relevant TAAs across solid tumors, enabling the prioritization of biologically plausible TAA pairs. The identification of both recurrent and tumor-specific associations highlights distinct co-expression landscapes that may help inform pan-tumoral and indication-driven bispecific ADC design. TAA co-expression patterns supporting bispecific ADC design (r ≥ 0.7). Reference TAA Recurrent correlated TAAs Tumor-specific correlated TAAs TCGA tumor types HER2 ERBB3 B7-H3, TPBG, PTK7 PAAD, BLCA, THYM, KIRP, THCA TROP2 NECTIN4, ERBB3, FUT3, LYPD3, MUC1, NaPi-2b ITGB6, EGFR, FGFR2/3, Tissue Factor, CEACAM5, B7-H4 ESCA, SKCM, THCA, UCS, THYM, KIRP, HNSC, CESC NECTIN4 TROP2, LYPD3, ERBB3, FUT3 c-MET, EFNA4, EGFR, CDH3, B7-H4, SLC44A4, Tissue Factor ESCA, SKCM, THCA, UCS, PAAD, THYM Tissue Factor – AXL, ITGB6, LYPD3, NECTIN4, ROR1, TROP2 THYM, SKCM, TGCT FOLR1 – NaPi-2b, RORC, B7-H4, ROR2 LUSC, PRAD, UVM c-MET ADAM9, AXL, CD46, EGFR ERBB3, ITGB6, NaPi-2b, FGFR2, TPBG, CD71 LIHC, STAD, THCA, PRAD, UVM, KIRP, KICH, THYM
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arevalo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: