Reveals that PAX4 R192H variant impairs β cell function, suggesting increased diabetes risk.
Background Type 2 diabetes is characterized by progressive β cell dysfunction, yet the mechanisms by which genetic susceptibility contributes to β cell area and function remain poorly understood. PAX4 is a transcription factor critical for β cell development, and a nonsynonymous variant resulting in an arginine-to-histidine substitution at position 192 (R192H) has been associated with increased type 2 diabetes risk and identified only in individuals of East Asian ancestry. Methods Here, we generated PAX4 R192H knock-in ( Pax4 R192H/R192H ) mouse and integrated metabolic phenotyping, bulk and single cell transcriptomics, and human cohort analyses to investigate how PAX4 R192H mutation increases the risk of type 2 diabetes. Results Homozygote knock-in mice ( Pax4 R192H) exhibited normal pancreatic endocrine development but developed glucose intolerance and impaired insulin secretion when fed a high-fat diet. Bulk and single-cell RNA-seq of islets from Pax4 R192H mice fed high-fat diet revealed impaired β cell adaptation to metabolic stress characterized by enhanced endoplasmic reticulum stress and impaired β cell maturity, with upregulation of dedifferentiation and α cell markers and downregulation of β cell identity genes. Pax4 deletion in β cells resulted in similar phenotypic and transcriptomic profiles to Pax4 R192H mice. In humans, the trajectories of β cell function were evaluated over a 14-year period using biennial oral glucose tolerance tests from 4,242 participants, where PAX4 R192H carriers showed 1.4-fold accelerated decline in disposition index, with increasing body mass index further exacerbating their type 2 diabetes risk. Conclusions Overall, PAX4 is essential for maintaining β cell identity and compensatory function under metabolic stress, and the R192H variant predisposes to type 2 diabetes by impairing this adaptive capacity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: