Key result
Subcostal RVOT VTI strongly correlates with LVOT VTI and predicts ≥17 cm with ~0.93 AUC.
Why the study?
Assessing cardiac output in critically ill patients via LVOT VTI often fails because adequate apical views are difficult to obtain in the intensive care unit.
Does RVOT VTI measured via a modified subcostal view correlate with LVOT VTI and identify normal LVOT VTI values in critically ill patients?
Observational (n=43)
Yes
Does RVOT VTI measured via a modified subcostal view correlate with LVOT VTI and identify normal LVOT VTI values in critically ill patients?
RVOT VTI measured from a modified subcostal view is a useful alternative to estimate forward flow when standard apical LVOT VTI assessment is unfeasible in critically ill patients.
RVOT VTI may substitute for LVOT VTI when apical views fail; leaves open its reliability for cardiac output assessment in critically ill patients.
Background Assessment of cardiac output by transthoracic echocardiography in critically ill patients commonly relies on measurement of the left ventricular outflow tract velocity‐time integral (LVOT VTI). However, obtaining an adequate apical view is not always possible in the intensive care unit. We evaluated whether right ventricular outflow tract velocity‐time integral (RVOT VTI), obtained from a modified subcostal view, correlates with LVOT VTI and whether it can identify patients with normal LVOT VTI values. Methods This was a post hoc analysis of a prospective diagnostic accuracy study performed in two mixed medical‐surgical intensive care units. Adult patients admitted between January and April 2022 were included when both RVOT and LVOT Doppler measurements were feasible. RVOT VTI was measured using a modified subcostal approach, whereas LVOT VTI was obtained from the apical five‐chamber view. Results Forty‐three patients were analyzed. RVOT VTI showed a strong positive correlation with LVOT VTI (Spearman r = 0.72, p < 0.0001). Bland–Altman analysis demonstrated a mean bias of −4.3 cm, with wide limits of agreement (−11.6 to +2.9 cm). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for predicting an LVOT VTI ≥ 17 cm was 0.934 (95% CI 0.815–0.970). An RVOT VTI > 14.6 cm predicted LVOT VTI ≥ 17 cm with 80.7% sensitivity (95% CI 62.5%–92.5%) and 100% specificity (95% CI 73.5%–100%). Conclusion RVOT VTI measured from a modified subcostal view may be a useful alternative when standard LVOT VTI assessment cannot be obtained in critically ill patients. Although both measurements should not be considered interchangeable, RVOT VTI may help identify normal forward flow and follow hemodynamic changes at the bedside.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheong et al. (2026) conducted an observational in critically ill patients (n=43). RVOT VTI measured via a modified subcostal view vs. LVOT VTI from the apical five-chamber view was evaluated on Correlation between RVOT VTI and LVOT VTI (Spearman r = 0.72, p=< 0.0001). RVOT VTI measured from a modified subcostal view strongly correlated with LVOT VTI (Spearman r = 0.72, p < 0.0001) and accurately predicted an LVOT VTI ≥ 17 cm (AUC 0.934).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: