Key result
AI offers significant potential across cardiovascular imaging modalities despite remaining challenges.
Why the study?
Recent advancements in artificial intelligence have significantly influenced image-based diagnostics in cardiovascular disease, warranting a structured review of its current state, applications, and future potential.
This review highlights the current state, categorization, and future potential of artificial intelligence in image-based cardiovascular disease diagnostics.
Cautions against routine clinical adoption of AI in cardiovascular imaging; leaves open rigorous prospective validation studies.
Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have significantly influenced the field of cardiovascular disease (CVD) analysis, particularly in image-based diagnostics. Our article presents an extensive review of AI applications in image-based CVD analysis, offering insights into its current state and future potential. We systematically categorize the literature based on the primary anatomical structures related to CVD, dividing them into nonvessel structures (such as ventricles and atria) and vessel structures (including the aorta and coronary arteries). This categorization provides a structured approach to explore various imaging modalities like computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, which are commonly used in CVD research. Our review encompasses these modalities, giving a broad perspective on the diverse imaging techniques integrated with AI for CVD analysis. We conclude with an examination of the challenges and limitations inherent in current AI-based CVD analysis methods and suggest directions for future research to overcome these hurdles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) conducted a review in Cardiovascular disease. Artificial intelligence in image-based diagnostics was evaluated. Artificial intelligence applications in image-based cardiovascular disease analysis offer significant potential across various imaging modalities, though challenges and limitations remain.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: