Retrospective analysis predicts 12-month graft loss in liver transplants, suggesting improved decision-making for patient allocation.
Background: Early graft loss after liver transplantation (LT) remains a major challenge. Most predictive models rely on isolated factors or post-transplant variables, limiting their utility in pre-transplant decision-making. We developed a novel score integrating donor, recipient, and procedural variables to estimate 12-month graft loss based on the balance between risk and mitigation factors. Methods: In this retrospective study, 268 adult primary LT recipients from two European centers were analyzed. The primary endpoint was 12-month graft loss (death or retransplantation). Independent predictors were identified using multivariable logistic regression based on pre-transplant variables. A population-centered approach quantified individual deviations from average risk, classifying variables as risk exposure or mitigation factors. These were combined into a Risk-Mitigation Balance score. Model performance was evaluated using AUC and Brier score, and patients were stratified into three risk groups. Results: Twelve-month graft loss occurred in 17.9% of patients. Acute liver failure and warm ischemia time were the strongest predictors. The Risk-Mitigation Balance score showed good discrimination (AUC = 0.74) and calibration (Brier score 0.116), outperforming early post-transplant models (AUC = 0.65). Stratification identified three groups with significantly different graft loss rates: 7.4% (mitigation), 14.8% (intermediate), and 44.2% (risk) (p < 0.001), with clear separation on survival analysis. Conclusions: This novel score enables pre-transplant estimation of graft loss by integrating risk and modifiable factors, supporting more informed and personalized allocation decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: