Background & Aims: Obesity and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) are major barriers to access to living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and increasingly prevalent among potential LDLT-donors. The extent to which obesity drives donor attrition during referral/evaluation and whether carefully selected donors with obesity associate with inferior outcomes are poorly defined. We aimed to characterize donor attrition from obesity and MASLD and evaluate donor/recipient outcomes among donors with obesity. Methods: All adult LDLT-donor referrals (n=1,963) at a high-volume US center (2018-2024) were included. Donor progression through screening, evaluation, and donation was assessed by BMI category. Institutional data were complemented by national SRTR-Registry analysis of association between donor BMI and recipient survival in adult LDLT recipients (2010- 2024). Results: From 1,963 referrals, 843 completed preliminary screening, including 295 donors with obesity. Only 14% of donors with obesity proceeded to donation versus 22% without obesity. Most donors with obesity were excluded before in-person evaluation, and >50% were declined after evaluation, most commonly due to MASLD. Donors with obesity proceeding to donation experienced longer evaluation-to-donation intervals but similar surgical complication profiles. Recipient outcomes did not differ by donor obesity status, including biliary or vascular complications or one-year recipient survival. In national analyses, donor BMI was not independently associated with recipient survival. Conclusions: Obesity and MASLD are dominant drivers of early donor attrition in LDLT, frequently limiting access before definitive evaluation. However, carefully selected donors with Class I obesity demonstrate preserved donor safety and comparable recipient outcomes at both institutional and national levels. These findings support a more individualized donor assessment strategy that prioritizes metabolic evaluation rather than BMI alone while maintaining donor safety and access to living donation.
Laique et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: