Key result
High PIN1 expression in urothelial carcinoma links to shorter progression-free survival but ~15% lower mortality.
Why the study?
While mechanistic studies implicate PIN1 in aggressiveness across cancer types, its clinical relevance in urothelial carcinoma remains unclear.
Does high PIN1 expression affect progression-free and overall survival in patients with urothelial carcinoma?
Cohort (n=4,886)
Does high PIN1 expression affect progression-free and overall survival in patients with urothelial carcinoma?
PIN1 expression identifies a subset of urothelial carcinoma with cholesterol pathway enrichment, aggressive genomic features, shorter rwPFS on 1L chemotherapy, but paradoxically longer overall survival.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High PIN1 expression warrants no change in urothelial carcinoma chemotherapy; leaves open its validation as prognostic marker or target.
e16575 Background: PIN1 is a phosphorylation-dependent prolyl isomerase that regulates oncogenic pathways, including cancer stemness, epithelial–mesenchymal transition, immune modulation, and cholesterol biosynthesis. While mechanistic studies implicate PIN1 in aggressiveness across cancer types, its clinical relevance in UC remains unclear. Methods: The Tempus Lens platform was used to identify a real-world cohort of patients (pts) with UC that underwent DNA (Tempus xT) and RNA (Tempus xR) sequencing (N = 4,886). Short variants and copy number changes are reported in our analysis. RNA data were quantified as transcripts per million (TPM) and reported as log2(TPM+1). Pts were classified as PIN1 high (PIN1-h, N = 1,157) or low (PIN1-l, N = 1,211) based on top and bottom mRNA expression quartiles. Single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) was used to characterize enrichment in MSigDB Hallmark and cholesterol related metabolic pathways. Real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (rwOS) were measured from initiation of first line (1L) therapy and sample collection date respectively. Propensity score weighting was used for balancing hyperlipidemia history and biopsy site. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using multivariable Cox regression. Median rwOS estimated using Kaplan–Meier curves and compared using log-rank tests. Results: The cohort was composed of pts with bladder (83%) and upper tract (17.2%) UC. Of pts with documented staging, 62.9% were metastatic and 16% had a history of hyperlipidemia. PIN1-h tumors were enriched in pathways suggesting increased lipid biosynthesis such as cholesterol regulation ( q < 0.001), glycerolipid metabolism (q < 0.001) and SREBF signaling (q < 0.004) as well as in oncogenic pathways (WNT/Beta Catenin, Notch, p53, KRAS). Immune-signatures (IL6, JAK STAT3 , IFNa, IFNγ) showed decreased enrichment in PIN1-h. Somatic alterations differed, with PIN1-h tumors having higher prevalence of tumor suppressor gene alterations TP53 (68% vs 54%) and RB1 (23% vs 16%) and lower rates of alterations in FGFR3 (11% vs 18%) and ARID1A (18% vs 27%), consistent with aggressive disease biology. rwPFS was shorter in pts with PIN1-h vs PIN1-l tumors when treated with 1L chemotherapy (HR 3.01, 95% CI 1.43-6.33; p = 0.004) but not 1L immunotherapy. Paradoxically, pts with PIN1-h tumors showed a modest but statistically significant improvement in rwOS (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.74–0.98; p = 0.030). Median rwOS was longer for PIN1-h vs PIN1-l (12.1 vs 15.5 months, p = 0.026). Conclusions: PIN1 expression identifies a distinct subset of UC characterized by cholesterol pathway enrichment and aggressive genomic features. While PIN1-h tumors show shorter rwPFS on 1L chemotherapy, they exhibit longer rwOS overall. These opposing outcomes highlight PIN1 as a complex, potentially treatment-specific prognostic biomarker.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Azari et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Urothelial carcinoma (n=4,886). High PIN1 expression (PIN1-h) vs. Low PIN1 expression (PIN1-l) was evaluated on Real-world overall survival (rwOS) (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.74-0.98, p=0.030). High PIN1 expression in urothelial carcinoma was associated with shorter progression-free survival on first-line chemotherapy but improved overall survival (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.74-0.98; P=0.030).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: