PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 30, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

A first-in-human phase 1a study of LP-184, a tumor site–activated novel alkylating agent, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

View Full Paper
DMDaruka MahadevanThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioJPJay ParekhThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioJBJ. Thaddeus BeckHighlands Oncology Group

Key Points

  • To assess the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of LP-184 in patients with advanced solid tumors.
  • Phase 1a trial (NCT05933265) with dose escalation
  • Enrolled patients with relapsed or refractory advanced solid tumors
  • Determined maximum tolerated dose using Bayesian optimal interval design
  • 63 patients treated across 12 dose cohorts with dose levels from 0.01 to 0.61 mg/kg
  • Dose limiting toxicities observed at dose levels 0.49 mg/kg (20%) and 0.61 mg/kg (40%)
  • Best observed response was stable disease in 40% of evaluable patients, with durable disease control seen in 3 patients with DDR mutations

Abstract

e15156 Background: Conventional alkylating agents are limited by systemic toxicities and lack of selectivity. LP-184 is a novel acylfulvene pro-drug that alkylates DNA only after being metabolized by the intracellular enzyme prostaglandin reductase1 (PTGR1), which is highly expressed in many solid tumors. In preclinical studies, LP-184 exhibited up to 12-fold enhanced anti-tumor activity in tumors with compromised DNA damage repair (DDR), such as BRCA and ATM mutations. LP-184 is being developed to target solid tumors with high PTGR1 expression and DDR deficiency. Methods: The dose escalation Phase 1a study (NCT05933265) enrolled patients with relapsed or refractory advanced solid tumors. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of LP-184. A Bayesian optimal interval design with a 30% target toxicity rate was used to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Patients received LP-184 IV over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle until disease progression or intolerability. PTGR1 expression was quantified by RT-qPCR using archival tissue. Gene alterations were obtained when available from patients’ most recent pre-enrollment genetic reports. Results: 63 patients were treated across 12 dose cohorts, with dose levels (DL) ranging from 0.01 to 0.61 mg/kg. Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred in 3 patients, including one case of grade 3 platelet count decrease progressing to grade 4 at 0.49 mg/kg (DL11; DLT rate = 20%) and two cases at 0.61 mg/kg (DL12; DLT rate = 40%) consisting of grade 3 alanine aminotransferase increase and acute liver injury. Dose delays due to treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 15 (24%) patients. Dose reduction due to TRAEs were reported in 2 patients (3%), both treated at DL11. Drug discontinuation due to TRAEs occurred in 4 patients (6%), including one each at DL07, DL08, DL11, and DL12. The most common TRAEs (≥20%) were nausea (52%), vomiting (46%), fatigue (21%), and platelet count decrease (21%). Grade ≥3 TRAEs that occurred in more than two patients included platelet count decrease (n = 6, 10%) and anemia (n = 3, 5%). The best observed response was stable disease, which occurred in 40% of evaluable patients. Durable disease control (≥ 1 year) was observed in 3 patients with DDR mutations of known interest. LP-184 had an apparent elimination half-life of ~20 minutes and achieved the projected therapeutic concentration at DL07. PTGR1 was quantifiable in 94% of assayed samples, supporting the feasibility of assessing associations between PTGR1 expression and clinical benefit in future studies. Conclusions: LP-184 demonstrates a manageable safety profile with encouraging antitumor efficacy in tumors harboring key DDR alterations. The MTD is 0.49 mg/kg IV administered on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. Clinical trial information: NCT05933265 .

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mahadevan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a81bf0307b78509433959https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.e15156
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper