Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial evaluates efficacy of cetuximab and lomustine in adults with recurrent glioblastoma, suggesting potential improvements in treatment outcomes.
TPS2095 Background: Recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) has a poor prognosis with no universally accepted systemic standard of care. Lomustine (CCNU) remains a commonly used benchmark, achieving 6-month progression-free survival (PFS-6) rates of approximately 20%. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification is present in a substantial proportion of GBMs and represents a biologically relevant therapeutic target. Cetuximab, an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated preclinical activity and limited clinical efficacy in EGFR-driven high-grade gliomas. CLARITY-GBM evaluates the safety and preliminary efficacy of combining cetuximab with lomustine in adults with recurrent high-grade glioblastoma. Methods: CLARITY-GBM is a prospective, open-label, multicenter, single-arm Phase II study conducted at four tertiary cancer centres in India. Eligible patients are adults (≥18 yrs) with histologically confirmed WHO grade 4 glioblastoma at first or second recurrence following standard chemoradiation, ECOG performance status 0–2, and measurable disease per RANO criteria. Participants will receive cetuximab intravenously 500 mg/m² every 2 weeks in combination with oral lomustine 110 mg/m² every 6 weeks. Treatment continues until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or investigator decision. Tumour assessments are performed every 6 weeks using MRI and evaluated according to RANO criteria. The study uses an exact single-stage Phase II design testing the null hypothesis that PFS-6 ≤20% versus the alternative hypothesis that PFS-6 ≥40%, with a one-sided alpha of 0.10 and 80% power. A total sample size of 25 patients is planned to ensure 24 evaluable patients for the primary analysis. The regimen will be considered promising if at least 8 patients are progression-free at 6 months. A single interim futility analysis is planned after 15 evaluable patients. The primary endpoint is PFS-6. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, overall survival, objective response rate, duration of response, safety and tolerability (CTCAE v5.0), corticosteroid-sparing effect, and health-related quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 and BN20). Exploratory analyses evaluate correlations with EGFR amplification, EGFRvIII status, and MGMT promoter methylation. Clinical trial information: CTRI/2026/01/100794. Design and key methodological features of the CLARITY-GBM trial. Characteristic Description Study Design Phase II, open-label, single-arm Population Adults with recurrent WHO grade 4 GBM Sample Size 25 planned (24 evaluable) Treatment Cetuximab q2w + Lomustine q6w Primary Endpoint PFS-6 Statistical Design One-sample exact binomial Null/Alternative PFS-6 ≤20% vs ≥40% Power/Alpha 80%, one-sided 0.10 Interim Analysis After 15 evaluable patients Exploratory Biomarkers EGFR, EGFRvIII, MGMT
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peelay et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: