Shows enhanced prediction of course success in students, suggesting better learning pathways.
The increasing adoption of data-driven educational systems requires reliable methods to predict student readiness for future coursework and support personalised learning pathways. This study proposes a graph-enhanced ensemble framework that integrates curriculum structure and skill-gap awareness to estimate student course readiness. A global prerequisite directed acyclic graph (DAG) of university subjects was constructed to model curriculum dependencies, from which structural features including the PageRank, in-degree, out-degree, and prerequisite chain depth were derived. In parallel, a domain-informed skill cluster mapping grouped subjects into nine interpretable competency domains to enable skill-gap analysis. These curriculum-aware features were combined with academic history, behavioural engagement, and demographic indicators to produce 38 engineered features for each student–subject pair. Six models (CatBoost, XGBoost, LightGBM, FT-Transformer, MLP and TabPFN) were trained and combined using a weighted ensemble. Experiments on a real-world institutional dataset containing 20,581 students and 727,168 records achieved an AUC of 0.8908 for predicting course success. Ablation experiments demonstrate that graph-derived and skill-cluster features provide modest but statistically significant incremental value. The resulting model was integrated into a prototype personalised recommender that prioritizes curriculum-consistent learning pathways. The proposed framework provides an interpretable and curriculum-aware approach for personalised learning. While the model demonstrates strong overall performance, a moderate gender disparity in the false positive rate was observed. Results were obtained on a large longitudinal dataset from a single university, and external validation at other institutions is needed to confirm generalizability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kozhirbayev et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: