Key result
Gross total resection lowered recurrence risk versus non-GTR (HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.21-0.89), while multiple intracranial lesions increased recurrence risk (HR 5.08; 95% CI 2.43-10.61).
Why the study?
Intracranial Rosai-Dorfman disease is a rare histiocytic disorder that often mimics meningioma and lacks standardized management.
Does gross total resection reduce recurrence compared to non-GTR in patients with intracranial Rosai-Dorfman disease?
Systematic Review (n=261)
Does gross total resection reduce recurrence compared to non-GTR in patients with intracranial Rosai-Dorfman disease?
In intracranial Rosai-Dorfman disease, gross total resection significantly reduces the risk of recurrence, whereas the presence of multiple lesions strongly predicts recurrence.
Requires integrated imaging-histopathology for intracranial RDD management; extends case-series data with quantified recurrence risks.
e14108 Background: Intracranial Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD) is a rare histiocytic disorder that often mimics meningioma and lacks standardized management. We synthesized recent evidence on presentation, imaging/pathology, treatment, outcomes, and predictors of recurrence. Methods: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and a registered protocol (PROSPERO: CRD420251107147). PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for case reports and case series (≤10 patients) describing histopathologically confirmed intracranial RDD. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. Descriptive statistics summarized patient, imaging, pathologic, treatment, and outcome variables. Group comparisons were performed using chi-square testing. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify independent predictors of recurrence. Results: From 1,897 records, 176 studies including 261 patients were identified (226 adults and 35 children; 65.5% male). Magnetic resonance imaging was available in nearly all cases; 88.8% of lesions were dural-based, and 32.2% of patients had multiple intracranial lesions. Imaging typically demonstrated T1 isointensity, T2 iso- or hypointensity, and homogeneous enhancement. Lesions were described as meningioma-like in 82.0% of cases, and lytic bone erosion was reported in 41.8%. Histopathologic examination showed emperipolesis in 97.0% of cases, with S-100 and CD68 positivity and CD1a negativity in approximately 96%. Surgical resection was the primary treatment approach, with gross total resection (GTR) achieved in 58.0% of patients. Adjuvant corticosteroids, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were administered in 33.6%, 16.7%, and 10.5%, respectively. Over a mean follow-up of 30.7 months, 84.2% of patients experienced functional improvement, recurrence occurred in 16.5%, and mortality was 5.7%. On multivariable analysis, the presence of multiple intracranial lesions was independently associated with higher recurrence risk (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 5.08; 95% CI, 2.43–10.61; P < 0.001), while GTR was associated with a lower risk of recurrence compared with non-GTR surgery (adjusted HR 0.44; 95% CI, 0.21–0.89; P = 0.022). Conclusions: Intracranial RDD most often presents as a dural-based, meningioma-like mass and requires histopathologic confirmation for diagnosis. Surgical resection remains the mainstay of treatment; however, lesion multiplicity is the strongest predictor of recurrence, supporting the need for long-term surveillance. The role of adjuvant therapies remains uncertain, emphasizing the importance of multicenter registries, standardized reporting, and molecular profiling to guide future management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Almusleh et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Intracranial Rosai-Dorfman disease (n=261). Gross total resection (GTR) vs. Non-GTR surgery was evaluated on Recurrence (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21-0.89, p=0.022). Gross total resection lowered recurrence risk versus non-GTR (HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.21-0.89), while multiple intracranial lesions increased recurrence risk (HR 5.08; 95% CI 2.43-10.61).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: