Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The study aimed to determine the evidence of content validity, construct validity, internal consistency, and the standardization of the sexual machismo/sexism scale (EMS-Sexismo-12) in a Colombian adult population. Participants were 678 people between 18 and 79 years of age (M= 26.32; SD=10.76) (50% women) from the city of Cartagena de Indias. The scale presented a good adaptation to the context, the Hernandez-Nieto CVC inter-judge coherence index = .936, the confirmatory factor analysis showed a unifactorial structure with 10 items that presented adequate adjustment indexes (CFI= .94, PNFI= .72, RMSEA = .04, [.041 - .057]). Good internal consistency reliability, McDonald's Omega of .92 and Ordinal Alpha of .94. The standardization was done by sex due to the differences between scores (U= 40284.00 p< .05). 52.65% of subjects showed a medium or higher level of sexual machismo/sexism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Quintana et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: