Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review reports effective pain relief in patients with trigeminal neuralgia from vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia, indicating MVD as a treatment option.
BACKGROUND: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) caused by vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia (VBD) is a rare but particularly challenging entity. Microvascular decompression (MVD) is considered the most definitive treatment; however, outcomes in this subgroup remain incompletely characterized. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception through August 22, 2025. Eligible studies reported on patients with VBD-TN undergoing MVD with extractable data on pain outcomes, recurrence, salvage interventions, or complications. Complete relief was defined as Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI)-I, while adequate relief included BNI-I to IIIb. RESULTS: Thirteen studies involving 315 patients were analyzed. The mean age ranged from 54.0 to 67.3 years, with 57.8% (182/315) being males. The pooled initial complete pain relief rate was 95.8% (95% CI, 92.3-98.2), with sustained relief at the last follow-up in 92.6% (95% CI, 88.4-96.1). Adequate relief was nearly universal, at 99.9% (95% CI, 98.2-100%) initially and 95.9% (95% CI, 91.8-98.8%) at the last follow-up. Pain recurrence occurred in 5.5% (95% CI, 2.9-8.9%), and salvage procedures were required in 1.3% (95% CI, 0.2-3.1%). The permanent morbidity was low at 2.4% (95% CI, 0.8-4.8%). Meta-regression indicated that prior ablative procedures were associated with higher complication rates, whereas V2 involvement predicted better long-term pain control. CONCLUSION: MVD appears to provide effective and durable pain relief for selected patients with VBD-TN, with low permanent morbidity but a clinically meaningful overall complication burden. Given the retrospective nature of the available evidence, MVD should be considered a promising treatment option rather than a definitive standard of care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hajikarimloo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: