e19104 Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has transformed the management of relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies. Despite increasing outpatient administration, CAR-T therapy remains frequently delivered in the inpatient setting, with substantial resource utilization. Contemporary national data describing real-world inpatient adoption patterns and outcomes across malignancy subtypes are limited. Methods: We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2017–2023. CAR-T therapy was identified using ICD-10-PCS procedure codes in any procedure field. The primary cohort included hospitalizations with a principal diagnosis of lymphoma or leukemia (ICD-10-CM C81–C86, C88, C90, C91–C95). Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and total hospital charges. Survey-weighted analyses accounted for clustering and stratification, with variance estimation using Taylor linearization at the hospital level. Stratified analyses were performed for lymphoma and leukemia admissions. Results: National inpatient CAR-T volume increased from 805 admissions in 2017 to 5,845 in 2021, with 4,310 admissions in 2023. In pooled analyses of lymphoma and leukemia admissions, CAR-T therapy was not associated with higher in-hospital mortality compared with non-CAR-T admissions (risk difference −0.36%, 95% CI −1.35% to 0.62%). CAR-T admissions were associated with significantly longer LOS (+15.0 days, 95% CI 14.0–16.1) and higher hospital charges (+$365,563, 95% CI $331,158–$399,968). In stratified analyses, CAR-T therapy was associated with lower inpatient mortality among lymphoma admissions (risk difference −4.66%, 95% CI −5.05% to −4.26%), while no mortality difference was observed among leukemia admissions. Increased LOS and hospital charges were observed in both strata. Conclusions: In a contemporary national cohort, inpatient CAR-T utilization expanded substantially following regulatory approval and was associated with markedly increased inpatient resource utilization. Inpatient mortality was not increased overall compared with non-CAR-T admissions, with important heterogeneity by diagnosis group. These findings provide real-world context for inpatient CAR-T delivery and may inform future strategies to optimize care pathways and resource allocation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nasir et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: