AbstractThis paper explores a core question: when AI's pattern-matching capability becomes powerful enough to affect human life, does the rebuttal "AI is only doing pattern matching" still hold any significance?This paper is divided into three parts:Part I reviews the history of AI development and shows how pattern-matching ability has evolved from absence to qualitative transformation;Part II discusses the history of human cognition and proposes that "the nature of understanding is pattern matching";Part III analyzes a three-stage model of cognitive development across a person's life - passive input, active construction, and real-world testing.In conclusion, this paper brings these three threads together, demonstrating structural alignment between stages of human cognitive development and phases of AI training, and uses the PocketOS event as an empirical case. It ultimately argues: when simulations produce real effects, the distinction between "simulation" and "reality" has lost its practical significance.
冥蚀 et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: