Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analyzes fracture toughness in steel pipes, suggesting the finite element model is more conservative.
This paper presents analysis of fracture assessment methods of axial partially-through crack in X65 and X70 steel pipes with internal pressure. Two analytical methods (Folin - Ciocalteu method (FC method) and Gauss–Seidel method (GS method)) are used to make assessment for two steel pipes (steel X65 and X70). Finite Element model of X65 and X70 steel full-scale pipes with axial part-through crack was established. In this work, a comparison is made between results obtained from FC and GS methods and finite element model with previous experimental results. The GS is more conservative assessment method as it provides smaller crack depth (a) corresponding to (Jcr). Finite Element model in case of steel X70 is more conservative than the analytical methods and its results close to the experimental values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Said et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: