Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Multicenter study clarifies EBER-negative nasopharyngeal carcinoma outcomes, indicating the need for tailored strategies.
e18144 Background: The current TNM staging system and treatment guidelines are primarily based on EBER-positive nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients, leaving a lack of high-level evidence to guide treatment decisions for EBER-negative patients. This study aims to clarify its clinical features and inform future therapeutic strategies. Methods: We conducted a multicenter study across seven centers in China. Key inclusion criterion required NPC patients to have undergone EBER in situ hybridization. The Kaplan-Meier curves were used for survival analysis, and inter-group differences were compared using the log-rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the impact of clinical and pathological factors on survival outcomes. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed at a 1:4 ratio between EBER-negative and EBER-positive cohorts, with matching based on clinical characteristics. A prognostic risk stratification model was performed. Results: This study analyzed 248 (20%) EBER-negative and 992 (80%) EBER-positive patients. Among these, 876 were male (71%). The EBER-negative NPC was significantly associated with the keratinizing subtype (26.2% vs. 0.7%, P < 0.001). Cox multivariable regression analysis of 1,240 patients identified EBER as an independent prognostic factor for NPC (HR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.35-0.70, P < 0.0001). Compared to EBER-positive patients, EBER-negative NPC had significantly inferior 5-year overall survival (79.9% vs. 90.2%), progression-free survival (PFS, 67.6% vs. 77.3%), and locoregional recurrence-free survival (84.3% vs. 92.1%, all P < 0.001). Conversely, EBER-negative patients exhibited a lower risk of distant metastasis, with a lower 5-year distant metastasis-free survival rate (92.3% vs. 86.0%, P = 0.006). Multivariate analysis shows T stage (HR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.05–1.99, P = 0.02) and hypertension status (HR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.03–2.75, P = 0.04) as independent prognostic factors for PFS in the EBER-negative cohort. The combined model, which included T stage, hypertension status, and others, had a higher discriminative performance for PFS (AUC, 0.741) compared to hypertension status, T stage alone, or other combination models (0.54, 0.58 and,0.62, respectively). Based on these factors, patients were divided into three risk groups, with 5-year PFS rates of 80.1%, 64.3%, and 52.5%, respectively (p=0.0011). Conclusions: EBER-negative NPC is a distinct, aggressive subtype characterized by keratinizing histology and poorer overall survival, yet it is associated with a lower risk of distant metastasis compared to EBER-positive NPC. A practical risk-stratification model was built. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and explore potential clinical applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xia et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: